Dear all,

I want to know the upper limit of mysql after which Mysql-5.* fails to
handle large amount of data ( 100's of GB or 100's of TB's ) . After
which we have to move to some NoSQL databases ( Hadoop, Hive , Hbase).

Currently we have 100 of GB's data in Mysql -5.1 RDBMS.

Is anyone has some experience of moving from these open -source databses
( Mysql, Postgresql ) to some mechanism of handling data in file systems.

Please share the views.



Thanks & best regards,

Adarsh Sharma



--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=gcdmg-mysql-2 [at] m.gmane.org

--------------enigBC78069789552CFA5DEC2213
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

there are no hard limits as long your hardware ist fast enough

* memory, memory and agin: memory
* disk-speed
* cpu

Am 16.02.2011 06:04, schrieb Adarsh Sharma:
> Dear all,
>
> I want to know the upper limit of mysql after which Mysql-5.* fails to=
handle large amount of data ( 100's of GB
> or 100's of TB's ) . After which we have to move to some NoSQL database=
s ( Hadoop, Hive , Hbase).
>
> Currently we have 100 of GB's data in Mysql -5.1 RDBMS.
>
> Is anyone has some experience of moving from these open -source databse=
s ( Mysql, Postgresql ) to some mechanism of
> handling data in file systems.
>
> Please share the views.
>
>
>
> Thanks & best regards,
>
> Adarsh Sharma
>
>
>

--

Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
CTO / software-development / cms-solutions
p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/


--------------enigBC78069789552CFA5DEC2213
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEUEARECAAYFAk1bgVkACgkQhmBjz394Ank5vwCXeRRLfV0bUO/UPScIVmAh z7EL
agCfcYfQJOuB3RylA3ZclEIZsZZ+xSM=
=CyTu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigBC78069789552CFA5DEC2213--

--0015174be68cad04b5049c64c2c2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mostly correct - save for pointer sizes and such, but it's pretty hard to
reach those.

SQL vs NoSQL is not a matter of data size - plenty of fud is being spread
about NoSQL, for some reason - but a matter of access patterns.

Without knowing what you need and how you design, that question can't be
answered.


On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl [at] thelounge.net>wrot=
e:

> there are no hard limits as long your hardware ist fast enough
>
> * memory, memory and agin: memory
> * disk-speed
> * cpu
>
> Am 16.02.2011 06:04, schrieb Adarsh Sharma:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I want to know the upper limit of mysql after which Mysql-5.* fails to
> handle large amount of data ( 100's of GB
> > or 100's of TB's ) . After which we have to move to some NoSQL database=
s
> ( Hadoop, Hive , Hbase).
> >
> > Currently we have 100 of GB's data in Mysql -5.1 RDBMS.
> >
> > Is anyone has some experience of moving from these open -source databse=
s
> ( Mysql, Postgresql ) to some mechanism of
> > handling data in file systems.
> >
> > Please share the views.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks & best regards,
> >
> > Adarsh Sharma
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald
> the lounge interactive design GmbH
> A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
> CTO / software-development / cms-solutions
> p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
> icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/
>
>


--
Bier met grenadyn
Is als mosterd by den wyn
Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel
Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel

--0015174be68cad04b5049c64c2c2--