--0003255735d287b50b047bc3eee9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
The page http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.2/static/datatype-datetime. htmlmentions
that the resolution of all time and timestamp data types is 1
microsecond. I have an application that runs on both a Windows (XP with
SP2) machine and a Linux (SUSE 10.2) machine. I saw that on postgres
enterprisedb 8.3 installed on both these machines, the default timestamp
precision on the former is upto a millisecond and on the latter it is 1
microsecond.
My curiosity is : is this a universal phenomenon ie a basic issue with
Windows? Or could there be some hardware or architectural differences or
something else...
And my problem is: is there any way to enforce a higher precision in
Windows? Because my application badly needs it.
Please help / guide.
Thanks a million,
Shruthi
--0003255735d287b50b047bc3eee9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,<br><br>The page <a href=3D"http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.2/static/da=
tatype-datetime.html">http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.2/sta tic/datatype-da=
tetime.html</a> mentions that the resolution of all time and timestamp data=
types is 1 microsecond.=A0=A0 I have an application that runs on both a Wi=
ndows (XP with SP2) machine and a Linux (SUSE 10.2) machine.=A0=A0 I saw th=
at on postgres enterprisedb 8.3 installed on both these machines, the defau=
lt timestamp precision on the former is upto a millisecond and on the latte=
r it is 1 microsecond.<br>
<br>My curiosity is : is this a universal phenomenon ie a basic issue with =
Windows?=A0 Or could there be some hardware or architectural differences or=
something else...=A0=A0 <br>And my problem is: is there any way to enforce=
a higher precision in Windows?=A0 Because my application badly needs it.<b=
r>
<br>Please help / guide.<br><br>Thanks a million,<br>Shruthi<br>
--0003255735d287b50b047bc3eee9--
