--001485f78c28285f320474ccf728
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi, what the opinion about this
http://suckit.blog.hu/2009/09/26/postgresql_history
I got this link from my friend.

--001485f78c28285f320474ccf728
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi, what the opinion about this http://suckit.blog.hu/2009/09/26/postgresql_history<br>I got this link from my friend.<br>

--001485f78c28285f320474ccf728--

--Io0qd97/NjzvBhmu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

* dayat (dayat.aceh [at] gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi, what the opinion about this
> http://suckit.blog.hu/2009/09/26/postgresql_history
> I got this link from my friend.

It's not terrible, but it's very, very, very selective. It's not a good
general benchmark. Also, the difference between 8.3 and 8.4 isn't very
large for this workload while there are many workloads where we're
pretty confident 8.4 will perform better. Personally, I believe the
'real world' work cases will be much improved under 8.4.

Thanks,

Stephen

--Io0qd97/NjzvBhmu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrDeSEACgkQrzgMPqB3kigkOgCeNwr6WN+OEA9qPo6eS4bz YiiU
mioAnjyoi0T7P/nz4jfflJtu08iGs/Lh
=Z5cQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Io0qd97/NjzvBhmu--