On Mar 31, 12:43 pm, --CELKO-- <jcelko... [at] earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> Why do you assume that all flags are aggregations? <<
>
> Not aggregations per se, but things set by events at a different level
> of abstraction in the data model. Most of my postings have dealt with
> things that should be deduced from simple facts within the schema
> ("John is eligible for a higher credit rating because he passed one of
> several tests (predicates and formulas)" as opposed "We gave John a
> higher credit rating by setting a flag and have no idea why!")
I have provided you some examples when a flag cannot be derived from
other data. You have chosen not to reply.
