HTML Table Question
This is probably a basic question but seems to be hard for me to find.
How do you tell a cell to take up all the vertical space it can? (By
default the 1st cell does it but I want the 3rd to). style="height:
100%;" doesn't work and can't find a "vertical-align:justify;"
option. Below is what my table looks like.
1 2
3 4
5 6
1/3/5 are all merged with rowspan=2. Cell 2 has to fit its data.
Cell 4 has to be right under Cell 2 always. I want Cell 6 to take up
any extra room with blank space so that Cell 1 or 4 arn't stretched
(Cell 4 has special background).
Note:
1 2
3 4
This situation would also be fine (1/3 merged). It works the way I
want it to when Cell 2 is higher than the data in 1/3. But when data
in Cell 2 is small then Cell 2 gets stretched which I'd like to
advoid.
Thanks
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
In article
<c06ed205-11ee-44e8-a012-4ff956ac294a [at] h11g2000prf.googlegroups.co
m>,
NvrBst <nvrbst [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> This is probably a basic question but seems to be hard for me to find.
>
> How do you tell a cell to take up all the vertical space it can? (By
> default the 1st cell does it but I want the 3rd to). style="height:
> 100%;" doesn't work and can't find a "vertical-align:justify;"
> option. Below is what my table looks like.
>
> 1 2
> 3 4
> 5 6
>
> 1/3/5 are all merged with rowspan=2. Cell 2 has to fit its data.
> Cell 4 has to be right under Cell 2 always. I want Cell 6 to take up
> any extra room with blank space so that Cell 1 or 4 arn't stretched
> (Cell 4 has special background).
>
>
> Note:
> 1 2
> 3 4
>
> This situation would also be fine (1/3 merged). It works the way I
> want it to when Cell 2 is higher than the data in 1/3. But when data
> in Cell 2 is small then Cell 2 gets stretched which I'd like to
> advoid.
>
Excuse me while I pray:
Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
thank you.
PS. And wipe all those tut tuts from the faces of your most
faithful servants.
--
dorayme
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 10, 7:13 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Excuse me while I pray:
> Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
> subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
> thank you.
Whats a flying url?
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 10, 4:13=A0pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article
> <c06ed205-11ee-44e8-a012-4ff956ac2... [at] h11g2000prf.googlegroups.co
> m>,
>
>
>
>
>
> =A0NvrBst <nvr... [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is probably a basic question but seems to be hard for me to find.
>
> > How do you tell a cell to take up all the vertical space it can? (By
> > default the 1st cell does it but I want the 3rd to). =A0style=3D"height:=
> > 100%;" doesn't work and can't find a "vertical-align:justify;"
> > option. =A0Below is what my table looks like.
>
> > 1 2
> > 3 4
> > 5 6
>
> > 1/3/5 are all merged with rowspan=3D2. =A0Cell 2 has to fit its data.
> > Cell 4 has to be right under Cell 2 always. =A0I want Cell 6 to take up
> > any extra room with blank space so that Cell 1 or 4 arn't stretched
> > (Cell 4 has special background).
>
> > Note:
> > 1 2
> > 3 4
>
> > This situation would also be fine (1/3 merged). =A0It works the way I
> > want it to when Cell 2 is higher than the data in 1/3. =A0But when data
> > in Cell 2 is small then Cell 2 gets stretched which I'd like to
> > advoid.
>
> Excuse me while I pray:
>
> Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
> subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
> thank you.
>
> PS. And wipe all those tut tuts from the faces of your most
> faithful servants.
>
> --
> dorayme- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hehe sorry don't have a URL yet... I was able to acomplish what I
want by seperating column 1 and column 2 into 2 seperate tables and
then putting both tables into a new table. If someone has a more
elegant solution please tell. Below is how my solution looks like in
code form if it helps
<table style:"vertial-align: top;"><tr>
<td> <table><tr><td>*Menu*</td></tr></table> </td>
<td> <table><tr><td>*Data1*</td></tr><tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr></
table> </td>
</tr></table>
Using 3 tables isn't that elegant though... This is what I'd like it
to look like, what it was before (In code form)
<table>
<tr>
<td rowspan=3D"3">*Menu*</td>
<td>*Data1*</td>
</tr>
<tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr>
<tr><td style=3D"vertial-align:justify;"></td></tr>
</table>
What doesn't work in the this way is the "vertical-align:justify;"
line. I've tried setting the cells above it to "height: auto;" (which
is suppose to give it the min size they can be) and then leaving the
last cell with no height set but that didn't work either.
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
dorayme wrote:
> Excuse me while I pray:
>
> Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
> subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
> thank you.
Hallelujah!
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Re: HTML Table Question
In article
<f99376ef-8f85-4458-ad0b-79f3a2ebecfa [at] q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.co
m>,
Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 7:13 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > Excuse me while I pray:
> > Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
> > subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
> > thank you.
>
> Whats a flying url?
I reckon this is a trick question.
--
dorayme
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> Hehe sorry don't have a URL yet...
Well you can upload an example. Use your ISP's personal webspace or some
free server...
I was able to acomplish what I
> want by seperating column 1 and column 2 into 2 seperate tables and
> then putting both tables into a new table. If someone has a more
> elegant solution please tell. Below is how my solution looks like in
> code form if it helps
>
> <table style:"vertial-align: top;"><tr>
> <td> <table><tr><td>*Menu*</td></tr></table> </td>
> <td> <table><tr><td>*Data1*</td></tr><tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr></
> table> </td>
> </tr></table>
>
>
> Using 3 tables isn't that elegant though... This is what I'd like it
> to look like, what it was before (In code form)
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td rowspan="3">*Menu*</td>
> <td>*Data1*</td>
> </tr>
> <tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr>
> <tr><td style="vertial-align:justify;"></td></tr>
> </table>
>
> What doesn't work in the this way is the "vertical-align:justify;"
> line. I've tried setting the cells above it to "height: auto;" (which
> is suppose to give it the min size they can be) and then leaving the
> last cell with no height set but that didn't work either.
1) There is no value "justify" for property "vertical-align". Valid values:
baseline | sub | super | top | text-top | middle | bottom | text-bottom
| <percentage> | <length> | inherit
Anyway if you wish to duplicate your three table layout with one, then
you need colspan 2 not 3
<table>
<tr><td rowspan="2">*Menu*</td><td>*Data1*</td></tr>
<tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr>
</table>
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Re: HTML Table Question
In article
<af3bdd8c-4cfd-4045-b1b5-1aefa6504a1e [at] y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
>,
NvrBst <nvrbst [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 4:13 pm, dorayme:
> > Excuse me while I pray:
> >
>
> Hehe sorry don't have a URL yet... I was able to acomplish what I
> want by seperating column 1 and column 2 into 2 seperate tables and
> then putting both tables into a new table. If someone has a more
> elegant solution please tell. Below is how my solution looks like in
> code form if it helps
>
> <table style:"vertial-align: top;"><tr>
> <td> <table><tr><td>*Menu*</td></tr></table> </td>
> <td> <table><tr><td>*Data1*</td></tr><tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr></
> table> </td>
> </tr></table>
>
>
> Using 3 tables isn't that elegant though... This is what I'd like it
> to look like, what it was before (In code form)
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td rowspan="3">*Menu*</td>
> <td>*Data1*</td>
> </tr>
> <tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr>
> <tr><td style="vertial-align:justify;"></td></tr>
> </table>
>
> What doesn't work in the this way is the "vertical-align:justify;"
> line. I've tried setting the cells above it to "height: auto;" (which
> is suppose to give it the min size they can be) and then leaving the
> last cell with no height set but that didn't work either.
>
This the sort of thing you want:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>test</title>
<style type="text/css">
table {border-collapse: collapse;}
td {padding: 1em; border:1px solid;}
h1 {font-size: 1.2em; margin-top: 0; padding-top: 0;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" >
<h1>Menu</h1>
<ul>
<li>menu item</li>
<li>menu item</li>
<li>menu item</li>
<li>menu item</li>
<li>menu item</li>
<li>menu item</li>
<li>menu item</li>
<li>menu item</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>*Data1*</td></tr>
<tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
?
I don't see why I should be the sucker all the time who supplies
the urls <g>
--
dorayme
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 10, 4:53=A0pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... [at] centralva.net>
wrote:
> NvrBst wrote:
> > Hehe sorry don't have a URL yet... =A0
>
> Well you can upload an example. Use your ISP's personal webspace or some
> free server...
>
> I was able to acomplish what I
>
>
>
>
>
> > want by seperating column 1 and column 2 into 2 seperate tables and
> > then putting both tables into a new table. =A0If someone has a more
> > elegant solution please tell. =A0Below is how my solution looks like in
> > code form if it helps
>
> > <table style:"vertial-align: top;"><tr>
> > <td> =A0<table><tr><td>*Menu*</td></tr></table> =A0</td>
> > <td> =A0<table><tr><td>*Data1*</td></tr><tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr></
> > table> =A0</td>
> > </tr></table>
>
> > Using 3 tables isn't that elegant though... =A0This is what I'd like it
> > to look like, what it was before (In code form)
> > <table>
> > <tr>
> > <td rowspan=3D"3">*Menu*</td>
> > <td>*Data1*</td>
> > </tr>
> > <tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr>
> > <tr><td style=3D"vertial-align:justify;"></td></tr>
> > </table>
>
> > What doesn't work in the this way is the "vertical-align:justify;"
> > line. =A0I've tried setting the cells above it to "height: auto;" (which=
> > is suppose to give it the min size they can be) and then leaving the
> > last cell with no height set but that didn't work either.
>
> 1) There is no value "justify" for property "vertical-align". Valid values=
:
>
> baseline | sub | super | top | text-top | middle | bottom | text-bottom
> | <percentage> | <length> | inherit
>
> Anyway if you wish to duplicate your three table layout with one, then
> you need colspan 2 not 3
>
> <table>
> <tr><td rowspan=3D"2">*Menu*</td><td>*Data1*</td></tr>
> <tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr>
> </table>
>
> --
> Take care,
>
> Jonathan
> -------------------
> LITTLE WORKS STUDIOhttp://www.LittleWorksStudio.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
The Example I gave above was this though (So I think I'd need
rowspan=3D3).
<table>
<tr><td rowspan=3D"3">*Menu*</td> <td>*Data1*</td> </tr>
<tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr>
<tr><td style=3D"vertial-align:justify;"></td></tr>
</table>
I need the "vertial-align:justify;" cell so that vertical stretching
doesn't occur in the *Data1* and *Data2* cells. I know there is no
justify for vertical alignment but I stated it because that is the
kind of effect I need.
If I use your example (using rowspan=3D2) then I'd have the problem (as
labled in the inital post) of *Data2* cell being stretched when *Data1*
+*Data2* height is less than *Menu*
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> I need the "vertial-align:justify;" cell so that vertical stretching
> doesn't occur in the *Data1* and *Data2* cells. I know there is no
> justify for vertical alignment but I stated it because that is the
> kind of effect I need.
>
> If I use your example (using rowspan=2) then I'd have the problem (as
> labled in the inital post) of *Data2* cell being stretched when *Data1*
> +*Data2* height is less than *Menu*
Maybe what the real problem is that you are using a table for layout
when you should be using something else. If you rowspan the left column
cell and the right column you add data that expand the cells vertically
it is "natural" table behavior for the left column rowspan'ed cell to
also expand vertically
Now looking into my crystal ball I see that the left cell you put the
word "menu" so chances are you have a *list* of menu items. If it a list
you should use a list! If you want it side by side with your data then
float it left. Google "2 column css layout template"
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 10, 5:47=A0pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... [at] centralva.net>
wrote:
> NvrBst wrote:
> > I need the "vertial-align:justify;" cell so that vertical stretching
> > doesn't occur in the *Data1* and *Data2* cells. =A0I know there is no
> > justify for vertical alignment but I stated it because that is the
> > kind of effect I need.
>
> > If I use your example (using rowspan=3D2) then I'd have the problem (as
> > labled in the inital post) of *Data2* cell being stretched when *Data1*
> > +*Data2* height is less than *Menu*
>
> Maybe what the real problem is that you are using a table for layout
> when you should be using something else. If you rowspan the left column
> cell and the right column you add data that expand the cells vertically
> it is "natural" table behavior for the left column rowspan'ed cell to
> also expand vertically
>
> Now looking into my crystal ball I see that the left cell you put the
> word "menu" so chances are you have a *list* of menu items. If it a list
> you should use a list! If you want it side by side with your data then
> float it left. Google "2 column css layout template"
>
> --
> Take care,
>
> Jonathan
> -------------------
> LITTLE WORKS STUDIOhttp://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Ahh, something tables can't do? Okay :) CSS approach looks like its
the same thing as the table approach though (except using 3 DIV's
instead of 3 TABLE's). Maybe DIV has performance improvments? I'll
look into it a bit.
Thanks
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 10, 6:34=A0pm, NvrBst <nvr... [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 5:47=A0pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... [at] centralva.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > NvrBst wrote:
> > > I need the "vertial-align:justify;" cell so that vertical stretching
> > > doesn't occur in the *Data1* and *Data2* cells. =A0I know there is no
> > > justify for vertical alignment but I stated it because that is the
> > > kind of effect I need.
>
> > > If I use your example (using rowspan=3D2) then I'd have the problem (a=
s
> > > labled in the inital post) of *Data2* cell being stretched when *Data1=
*
> > > +*Data2* height is less than *Menu*
>
> > Maybe what the real problem is that you are using a table for layout
> > when you should be using something else. If you rowspan the left column
> > cell and the right column you add data that expand the cells vertically
> > it is "natural" table behavior for the left column rowspan'ed cell to
> > also expand vertically
>
> > Now looking into my crystal ball I see that the left cell you put the
> > word "menu" so chances are you have a *list* of menu items. If it a list=
> > you should use a list! If you want it side by side with your data then
> > float it left. Google "2 column css layout template"
>
> > --
> > Take care,
>
> > Jonathan
> > -------------------
> > LITTLE WORKS STUDIOhttp://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
>
> Ahh, something tables can't do? =A0Okay :) =A0CSS approach looks like its
> the same thing as the table approach though (except using 3 DIV's
> instead of 3 TABLE's). =A0Maybe DIV has performance improvments? =A0I'll
> look into it a bit.
>
> Thanks
>
> NB- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Oww you weren't suggesting 3 DIV's. What I have is a "asp:Menu" and a
"asp:ContentPlaceHolder" (in a master file). You were suggesting
applying the CSS styles directly to those. I see now, that should
work I think. I'll try it tomorrow when I get back.
Thanks :)
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 10, 7:42 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
> > > subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
> > > thank you.
> > Whats a flying url?
> I reckon this is a trick question.
I was just filling in the " * "
Re: HTML Table Question
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:13:56 +1100, dorayme
<doraymeRidThis [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:
: Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
: subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
: thank you.
Amen to that.
Sid
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 11, 2:52=A0am, Sid <el... [at] nospam.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:13:56 +1100, dorayme
>
> <doraymeRidT... [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> : Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
> : subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
> : thank you.
>
> Amen to that.
>
> Sid
LOL you all act like this is the most complicated question ever...
The first post was 5 sentances with ASCII art! ASCII art is worth
1000 URL links! hehe
Applying the CSS style to the asp:Menu object with the
"float:left;" (Didn't know CSS has a property like this, thanks) works
exactly like I wanted it :) I still had to put *Data1* / *Data2* into
a table (*Data2* needs a background and boarder so it had to be in a
table, I think).
I think jona just mixed up when you were typing (the example you gave
was backwards IE: if left column is rowspaned and a cell in right
column gets lots of data then its not "natural" for left column to
expand... its impossbles for it not too). I do find it slightly
"unnatural" that when the left rowspaned column gets lots of data that
I'm unable to tell which cell is to expand in the right column. I'd
expect all the cells to expand equally, or by default the last cell
only; but what was happening in IE7 was the 1st cell only was
expanding and the last 2 just had their "auto" height. I wanted 3rd
cell in the right column expanding and the first 2 to have the "auto"
height :P
But with the CSS its the way I want it, and more elegant to boot :)
Thank you all for you help.
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> LOL you all act like this is the most complicated question ever...
> The first post was 5 sentances with ASCII art! ASCII art is worth
> 1000 URL links! hehe
No, actually seen the source in situ is worth a 100,000 ASCII art
postings. There we see what the OP actually did not what they think they
did. Also we see how the server's part that may be at play.
>
> Applying the CSS style to the asp:Menu object with the
> "float:left;"
Whatever asp:Menu object is, what we need is the output HTML that is way
a URL is important. It would be like try to guess the problem of a PHP
object... $myObject->menu() what is important is resultant outputted HTML
> (Didn't know CSS has a property like this, thanks) works
> exactly like I wanted it :)
Maybe http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html might assist you.
> I still had to put *Data1* / *Data2* into
> a table (*Data2* needs a background and boarder so it had to be in a
> table, I think).
No, not necessarily. You can style other block elements with backgrounds
and borders. If the "data" is tabular in nature then use a TABLE. If
paragraphs then P, is a list then UL or OL, else DIV might apply.
>
> I think jona just mixed up when you were typing (the example you gave
> was backwards IE: if left column is rowspaned and a cell in right
> column gets lots of data then its not "natural" for left column to
> expand... its impossbles for it not too). I do find it slightly
> "unnatural" that when the left rowspaned column gets lots of data that
> I'm unable to tell which cell is to expand in the right column. I'd
> expect all the cells to expand equally, or by default the last cell
> only; but what was happening in IE7 was the 1st cell only was
> expanding and the last 2 just had their "auto" height. I wanted 3rd
> cell in the right column expanding and the first 2 to have the "auto"
> height :P
No, if you have
<table>
<tr><td rowspan="2">A1</td><td>B1</td><tr>
<tr><td>B2</td></tr>
</table>
+----+----+
| | B1 |
| A1 |----+
| | B2 |
+----+----+
If you add data to B1 and|or B2 that expands the height of the table,
the rowspan'ed A1 must expand to the combined height of the cells B1 +
B2 even if A1 have very little content. That is how a table works.
However if A1 is a floated block element then
+----+----+
| A1 | B1 |
|----+ |
| |
+---------+
| B2 |
+---------+
or
+----+----+
| A1 | B1 |
|----+ |
| |
+----+
| B2 |
+----+
can be accomplish.
>
> But with the CSS its the way I want it, and more elegant to boot :)
> Thank you all for you help.
True in many cases.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Re: HTML Table Question
In article
<6e09366e-30fd-4e88-9bec-067a2ff5a8b6 [at] m34g2000hsf.googlegroups.co
m>,
Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 7:42 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT... [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > > Dearest God Almighty, greatest of all HTML authors, Please make a
> > > > subscriber who has a complicated question supply a f*ing url.
> > > > thank you.
> > > Whats a flying url?
> > I reckon this is a trick question.
>
> I was just filling in the " * "
I still think it is a trick.
--
dorayme
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 11, 11:28=A0am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... [at] centralva.net>
wrote:
> NvrBst wrote:
> > LOL you all act like this is the most complicated question ever...
> > The first post was 5 sentances with ASCII art! =A0ASCII art is worth
> > 1000 URL links! hehe
>
> No, actually seen the source in situ is worth a 100,000 ASCII art
> postings. There we see what the OP actually did not what they think they
> did. Also we see how the server's part that may be at play.
>
>
>
> > Applying the CSS style to the asp:Menu object with the
> > "float:left;"
>
> Whatever asp:Menu object is, what we need is the output HTML that is way
> a URL is important. It would be like try to guess the problem of a PHP
> object... $myObject->menu() what is important is resultant outputted HTML
>
> > (Didn't know CSS has a property like this, thanks) works
> > exactly like I wanted it :) =A0
>
> Maybehttp://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.htmlmight assist you.
>
> > I still had to put *Data1* / *Data2* into
> > a table (*Data2* needs a background and boarder so it had to be in a
> > table, I think).
>
> No, not necessarily. You can style other block elements with backgrounds
> and borders. If the "data" is tabular in nature then use a TABLE. If
> paragraphs then P, is a list then UL or OL, else DIV might apply.
>
>
>
> > I think jona just mixed up when you were typing (the example you gave
> > was backwards IE: if left column is rowspaned and a cell in right
> > column gets lots of data then its not "natural" for left column to
> > expand... its impossbles for it not too). =A0I do find it slightly
> > "unnatural" that when the left rowspaned column gets lots of data that
> > I'm unable to tell which cell is to expand in the right column. =A0I'd
> > expect all the cells to expand equally, or by default the last cell
> > only; but what was happening in IE7 was the 1st cell only was
> > expanding and the last 2 just had their "auto" height. =A0I wanted 3rd
> > cell in the right column expanding and the first 2 to have the "auto"
> > height :P
>
> No, if you have
>
> <table>
> <tr><td rowspan=3D"2">A1</td><td>B1</td><tr>
> <tr><td>B2</td></tr>
> </table>
>
> +----+----+
> | =A0 =A0| B1 |
> | A1 |----+
> | =A0 =A0| B2 |
> +----+----+
>
> If you add data to B1 and|or B2 that expands the height of the table,
> the rowspan'ed A1 must expand to the combined height of the cells B1 +
> B2 even if A1 have very little content. That is how a table works.
> However if A1 is a floated block element then
>
> +----+----+
> | A1 | B1 |
> |----+ =A0 =A0|
> | =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 |
> +---------+
> | =A0 B2 =A0 =A0|
> +---------+
>
> or
>
> +----+----+
> | A1 | B1 |
> |----+ =A0 =A0|
> =A0 =A0 =A0 | =A0 =A0|
> =A0 =A0 =A0 +----+
> =A0 =A0 =A0 | B2 |
> =A0 =A0 =A0 +----+
>
> can be accomplish.
>
>
>
> > But with the CSS its the way I want it, and more elegant to boot :)
> > Thank you all for you help.
>
> True in many cases.
>
> --
> Take care,
>
> Jonathan
> -------------------
> LITTLE WORKS STUDIOhttp://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Ahh two more questions. Your "Scenario C" was very simular to what I
wanted... For future reference, how would you accomplish this with a
2x2 table? All Cells are simply fitting their data (height wise).
+----+----+
| A1 | B1 |
| +----+
| | B2 |
| +----+
| |
+----+
But it looks like this if B1 contains is lots of data
+----+----+
| A1 | B1 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
+----+ |
| |
+----+
| B2 |
+----+
And my 2nd question, nothing to do with above; Is there a CSS Property
that would tell the object not to wrap to the next line. Right now I
have
<asp:Menu style=3D"float:left;" /><TABLE style=3D"???"><tr><td>*Data1*</
td></tr><tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr></TABLE>
Problem is when the window shirnks the table wraps down under the menu
- I want it to just make a vertical scrollbar instead of wrapping.
Way I'm thinking is ???=3D"position:absolute; margin-left:180px;". I
don't like setting margin-left:180px since it has to be updated each
time the font of the menu changes.
Thanks
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> And my 2nd question, nothing to do with above; Is there a CSS Property
> that would tell the object not to wrap to the next line. Right now I
> have
>
> <asp:Menu style="float:left;" /><TABLE style="???"><tr><td>*Data1*</
^^^^^^^^
Still have no idea what HTML this "asp:Menu" represents, if you are
*not* going to supply a URL then at least insert what the ASP output
would be...
> td></tr><tr><td>*Data2*</td></tr></TABLE>
>
> Problem is when the window shirnks the table wraps down under the menu
Yep that what floats do when blocks don't fit!
> - I want it to just make a vertical scrollbar instead of wrapping.
> Way I'm thinking is ???="position:absolute; margin-left:180px;". I
> don't like setting margin-left:180px since it has to be updated each
> time the font of the menu changes.
#1 defining *text* blocks in "px" pixels is a *bad* idea. If user has a
different font size (and yes they can do that and you cannot prevent
them) then the text will not fit within your containers and the design
will break. I should use "em" that is proportion to the font used.
#2 "position:absolute" also a bad idea especially for novices that do
not know how to use it properly. Can screw up printing your page...
One way is to set the min-width of your container. Now <=IE6 will not
support "min-width" and there are some workarounds that you can Google
for, or say "screw it!" Works in "real" modern web browsers and now in
IE7 and maybe soon we can "adieu!" to IE6 and it's younger siblings
(Can't wait for IE7's passing too)
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta http-equiv="content-language" content="en-us">
<title>Use min-width</title>
<style type="text/css">
/* use 'em' adjust for min width without wrapping */
body { min-width: 20em; overflow: auto; }
ul.menu { float: left; list-style: none; margin: 1em; padding: 0; }
ul.menu li { margin: 0; padding: 0; }
table { border: 2px solid black; border-collapse: collapse; }
th, td { border: 1px solid black; padding: 0 .25em; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<ul class="menu">
<li>Menu item1</li>
<li>Menu item2</li>
<li>Menu item3</li>
<li>Menu item4</li>
<li>Menu item5</li>
<li>Menu item6</li>
</ul>
<table>
<tr><th>Row</th><th>Value A</th><th>Value B</th></tr>
<tr><td>0</td><td>A0</td><td>B0</td></tr>
<tr><td>1</td><td>A1</td><td>B1</td></tr>
<tr><td>2</td><td>A2</td><td>B2</td></tr>
<tr><td>3</td><td>A3</td><td>B3</td></tr>
<tr><td>4</td><td>A4</td><td>B4</td></tr>
<tr><td>5</td><td>A5</td><td>B5</td></tr>
<tr><td>6</td><td>A6</td><td>B6</td></tr>
<tr><td>7</td><td>A7</td><td>B7</td></tr>
<tr><td>8</td><td>A8</td><td>B8</td></tr>
<tr><td>9</td><td>A9</td><td>B9</td></tr>
<tr><td>10</td><td>A10</td><td>B10</td></tr>
<tr><td>11</td><td>A11</td><td>B11</td></tr>
<tr><td>12</td><td>A12</td><td>B12</td></tr>
<tr><td>13</td><td>A13</td><td>B13</td></tr>
<tr><td>14</td><td>A14</td><td>B14</td></tr>
<tr><td>15</td><td>A15</td><td>B15</td></tr>
<tr><td>16</td><td>A16</td><td>B16</td></tr>
<tr><td>17</td><td>A17</td><td>B17</td></tr>
<tr><td>18</td><td>A18</td><td>B18</td></tr>
<tr><td>19</td><td>A19</td><td>B19</td></tr>
<tr><td>20</td><td>A20</td><td>B20</td></tr>
<tr><td>21</td><td>A21</td><td>B21</td></tr>
<tr><td>22</td><td>A22</td><td>B22</td></tr>
<tr><td>23</td><td>A23</td><td>B23</td></tr>
<tr><td>24</td><td>A24</td><td>B24</td></tr>
<tr><td>25</td><td>A25</td><td>B25</td></tr>
<tr><td>26</td><td>A26</td><td>B26</td></tr>
<tr><td>27</td><td>A27</td><td>B27</td></tr>
<tr><td>28</td><td>A28</td><td>B28</td></tr>
<tr><td>29</td><td>A29</td><td>B29</td></tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Re: HTML Table Question
Ahh. Problem with the min-width would be my that it creates a vertical
scroll (size of the largest width in *Data1*), when 99% of the time
*Data1* is small -> would have to set it dynamically each time the
data in *Data1* changes so that the scroll bar doesn't appear when its
not needed (more work than its worth).
The 3 table method, or the position absolute both work though so I'll
fiddle around with those.
Thanks NB
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> Ahh. Problem with the min-width would be my that it creates a vertical
> scroll (size of the largest width in *Data1*), when 99% of the time
> *Data1* is small -> would have to set it dynamically each time the
> data in *Data1* changes so that the scroll bar doesn't appear when its
> not needed (more work than its worth).
Why would a *vertical* scroll be created to the *width* of anything?!
From what you say and the meager scraps of what you show it seems that
you have no idea what you are doing...
>
> The 3 table method, or the position absolute both work though so I'll
> fiddle around with those.
So I would say, most likely you are wrong and it *can* be done, but
since you are adamantly against providing a URL to what you are *trying*
to do...well good luck with that!
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 11, 4:26=A0pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... [at] centralva.net>
wrote:
> NvrBst wrote:
> > Ahh. Problem with the min-width would be my that it creates a vertical
> > scroll (size of the largest width in *Data1*), when 99% of the time
> > *Data1* is small -> would have to set it dynamically each time the
> > data in *Data1* changes so that the scroll bar doesn't appear when its
> > not needed (more work than its worth).
>
> Why would a *vertical* scroll be created to the *width* of anything?!
> =A0From what you say and the meager scraps of what you show it seems that
> you have no idea what you are doing...
>
>
>
> > The 3 table method, or the position absolute both work though so I'll
> > fiddle around with those.
>
> So I would say, most likely you are wrong and it *can* be done, but
> since you are adamantly against providing a URL to what you are *trying*
> =A0 to do...well good luck with that!
>
> --
> Take care,
>
> Jonathan
> -------------------
> LITTLE WORKS STUDIOhttp://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
LOL Typo. Horizontal Scroll Bar. If you want to see it yourself set
the min-width to 200em and you'll see the scroll bar.
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> On Jan 11, 4:26 pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... [at] centralva.net>
> wrote:
>> NvrBst wrote:
>>> Ahh. Problem with the min-width would be my that it creates a vertical
>>> scroll (size of the largest width in *Data1*), when 99% of the time
>>> *Data1* is small -> would have to set it dynamically each time the
>>> data in *Data1* changes so that the scroll bar doesn't appear when its
>>> not needed (more work than its worth).
>> Why would a *vertical* scroll be created to the *width* of anything?!
>> From what you say and the meager scraps of what you show it seems that
>> you have no idea what you are doing...
>>
>>
>>
>>> The 3 table method, or the position absolute both work though so I'll
>>> fiddle around with those.
>> So I would say, most likely you are wrong and it *can* be done, but
>> since you are adamantly against providing a URL to what you are *trying*
>> to do...well good luck with that!
> LOL Typo. Horizontal Scroll Bar. If you want to see it yourself set
> the min-width to 200em and you'll see the scroll bar.
Of course! 200em is *extremely* wide! About 400 characters! Make is
smaller as I said in the comment in the CSS
<style type="text/css">
/* use 'em' adjust for min width without wrapping */
body { min-width: 20em; overflow: auto; }
Adjust the value to the min (minimum) needed to display without wrapping.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 11, 5:31=A0pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... [at] centralva.net>
wrote:
> NvrBst wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 4:26 pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4... [at] centralva.net>
> > wrote:
> >> NvrBst wrote:
> >>> Ahh. Problem with the min-width would be my that it creates a vertical=
> >>> scroll (size of the largest width in *Data1*), when 99% of the time
> >>> *Data1* is small -> would have to set it dynamically each time the
> >>> data in *Data1* changes so that the scroll bar doesn't appear when its=
> >>> not needed (more work than its worth).
> >> Why would a *vertical* scroll be created to the *width* of anything?!
> >> =A0From what you say and the meager scraps of what you show it seems th=
at
> >> you have no idea what you are doing...
>
> >>> The 3 table method, or the position absolute both work though so I'll
> >>> fiddle around with those.
> >> So I would say, most likely you are wrong and it *can* be done, but
> >> since you are adamantly against providing a URL to what you are *trying=
*
> >> =A0 to do...well good luck with that!
> > LOL Typo. =A0Horizontal Scroll Bar. =A0If you want to see it yourself se=
t
> > the min-width to 200em and you'll see the scroll bar.
>
> Of course! 200em is *extremely* wide! About 400 characters! Make is
> smaller as I said in the comment in the CSS
>
> <style type=3D"text/css">
> =A0 =A0/* use 'em' adjust for min width without wrapping */
> =A0 =A0body { min-width: 20em; overflow: auto; }
>
> Adjust the value to the min (minimum) needed to display without wrapping.
>
> --
> Take care,
>
> Jonathan
> -------------------
> LITTLE WORKS STUDIOhttp://www.LittleWorksStudio.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
The extreme length is to illustrate the scroll bar, nothing more. As
stated already the *Data1* cells' content changes. Sometimes the cell
needs to be 1000 pixels wide (rarly) to fit its content and sometimes
30 pixels wide. Setting min-width to the largest the cell can be
isn't a good solution (for me), and making it so that the min-width
gets set dynamically with the cells content isn't a good approach
either (for me - time wise) since I have two "okay" methods that I can
live with :P
I would love a "better" way but I don't see how the min-width could be
it. A single 2x2 table (like the last ASCII table you drew) might be
a better solution if you could quickly pseudo code that table I'd love
to see it (I'd probably use that type of idea a lot in the future at
the very least). Or a way to stop the 2nd object from wraping down (I
don't understand completly all the CSS properties yet, like overload,
or maybe a different one that acts simular to float but different).
I thank everyone who gave me tid bits and idea's, they've all been
helpful for me :)
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> .. Sometimes the cell needs to be 1000 pixels wide (rarly) to fit its
> content and sometimes 30 pixels wide.
If that is true, there is a flaw in your design...
--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Vista
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 11, 10:33=A0pm, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.m... [at] example.invalid> wrote:
> NvrBst wrote:
> > .. Sometimes the cell needs to be 1000 pixels wide (rarly) to fit its
> > content and sometimes 30 pixels wide.
>
> If that is true, there is a flaw in your design...
>
> --
> =A0 =A0-bts
> =A0 =A0-Friends don't let friends drive Vista
Maybe :) If the COM object, that populates the
asp:ContentPlaceHolder, errors then it returns a single character
"-". 99% of the time the data returned from the COM is 500-600px'ish
but there are 1 or 2 larger data returns.
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>> NvrBst wrote:
>>> .. Sometimes the cell needs to be 1000 pixels wide (rarly) to fit
>>> its content and sometimes 30 pixels wide.
>>
>> If that is true, there is a flaw in your design...
>>
>> -- ( <-- please snip signatures beginning with this line )
>
> Maybe :) If the COM object, that populates the
> asp:ContentPlaceHolder, errors then it returns a single character
> "-". 99% of the time the data returned from the COM is 500-600px'ish
> but there are 1 or 2 larger data returns.
Set your error handler to return something like a one-pixel transparent
gif with a width parameter of .. 500-600px'ish width.
What kind of 'data' is this that varies so much in width?
--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Vista
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 12, 12:27=A0pm, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.m... [at] example.invalid> wrote:
> NvrBst wrote:
> > "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
> >> NvrBst wrote:
> >>> .. Sometimes the cell needs to be 1000 pixels wide (rarly) to fit
> >>> its content and sometimes 30 pixels wide.
>
> >> If that is true, there is a flaw in your design...
>
> >> -- ( <-- please snip signatures beginning with this line )
>
> > Maybe :) =A0If the COM object, that populates the
> > asp:ContentPlaceHolder, errors then it returns a single character
> > "-". =A099% of the time the data returned from the COM is 500-600px'ish
> > but there are 1 or 2 larger data returns.
>
> Set your error handler to return something like a one-pixel transparent
> gif with a width parameter of .. 500-600px'ish width.
>
> What kind of 'data' is this that varies so much in width?
>
> --
> =A0 =A0-bts
> =A0 =A0-Friends don't let friends drive Vista
I can't control what the COM object returns (its not my code) - Only
make requests. I can make a wrapper for it but its not really
needed. The data returned is tabular data (error rates and other
various statistics, etc).
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>> NvrBst wrote:
>>> Maybe :) If the COM object, that populates the
>>> asp:ContentPlaceHolder, errors then it returns a single character
>>> "-". 99% of the time the data returned from the COM is
>>> 500-600px'ish but there are 1 or 2 larger data returns.
>>
>> Set your error handler to return something like a one-pixel
>> transparent gif with a width parameter of .. 500-600px'ish width.
>>
>> What kind of 'data' is this that varies so much in width?
>
> I can't control what the COM object returns (its not my code) - Only
> make requests.
Ok, but can you post a page of some sort of sample result, so we don't
have to guess so much?
> I can make a wrapper for it but its not really needed. The data
> returned is tabular data (error rates and other various statistics,
> etc).
Statistics implies numbers or similar data, which would not be 1000px
wide. I'd want to see a sample prior to making any more guesses.
Don't forget to snip sig lines (that which follows) when you reply.
--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Vista
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 13, 5:38=A0am, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.m... [at] example.invalid> wrote:
=2E..
Ahh, the data can get very wide because of the number columns
returned. Some of the tables have thousands of cells (The site runs
on an intranet so bandwidth isn't an issue).
I don't know how I'd post the site (I'd need a free server with
ASPX(2.0) support, and the ability to install the COM object on their
computer). I can takes screenshots to post but I don't see how this
data is relevant.
Anyway, baically the column headers usally go something like "Msg / X1
Acks / X2 Acks / X1 N-Acks / X2 N-Acks / Rty 1 / Rty 2 / ... / Rty N /
Dup Msg / Dup Overlap / etc".
Needless to say the tables can get very wide. I was able to reduce my
solution from using 3 tables to just 2 tables (1 table with 2 cells "A
B"). 'A' has the menu, and 'B' has another table in it with two rows
*Data1* / *Data2*. I don't think it'll get more simple than that and
it works exactly as I want it (both 30px data and the 1000px'ish width
data in *Data1*) :)
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
Scripsit NvrBst:
> On Jan 13, 5:38 am, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
> <a.nony.m... [at] example.invalid> wrote:
> ...
That pseudoquotation doesn't really give us much context, does it?
> Ahh, the data can get very wide because of the number columns
> returned. Some of the tables have thousands of cells (The site runs
> on an intranet so bandwidth isn't an issue).
Is meaningfulness an issue? What would anyone _do_ with such a table?
This reminds me of the good old days when I worked in a computing centre
where line printers were the main output device, and there was a
researcher who printed out hundreds of pages about daily, picked up the
listing, flipped over to a certain page, looked at a number and threw
the listing away. He just couldn't be bothered to modify his output
routines to print just the data he actually needed.
Consider letting users select the data they need (typically, via a form
on a web page). This means some hard work to some programmer(s), but
once done, it saves a lot of labor and time.
> Anyway, baically the column headers usally go something like "Msg / X1
> Acks / X2 Acks / X1 N-Acks / X2 N-Acks / Rty 1 / Rty 2 / ... / Rty N /
> Dup Msg / Dup Overlap / etc".
Is this explanation supposed to help?
--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 13, 12:52=A0pm, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp... [at] cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> Scripsit NvrBst:
>
> > On Jan 13, 5:38 am, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
> > <a.nony.m... [at] example.invalid> wrote:
> > ...
>
> That pseudoquotation doesn't really give us much context, does it?
>
> > Ahh, the data can get very wide because of the number columns
> > returned. =A0Some of the tables have thousands of cells (The site runs
> > on an intranet so bandwidth isn't an issue).
>
> Is meaningfulness an issue? What would anyone _do_ with such a table?
> This reminds me of the good old days when I worked in a computing centre
> where line printers were the main output device, and there was a
> researcher who printed out hundreds of pages about daily, picked up the
> listing, flipped over to a certain page, looked at a number and threw
> the listing away. He just couldn't be bothered to modify his output
> routines to print just the data he actually needed.
>
> Consider letting users select the data they need (typically, via a form
> on a web page). This means some hard work to some programmer(s), but
> once done, it saves a lot of labor and time.
>
> > Anyway, baically the column headers usally go something like "Msg / X1
> > Acks / X2 Acks / X1 N-Acks / X2 N-Acks / Rty 1 / Rty 2 / ... / Rty N /
> > Dup Msg / Dup Overlap / etc".
>
> Is this explanation supposed to help?
>
> --
> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
LOL I did the pseudoquotation because I thought that you thought the
quotes were getting to long ("Don't forget to snip sig lines").
Anyway, as I said, I don't see how the column headers are relevant.
1000px isn't that wide and when you have many columns its easy to have
1000px width tables (the explanation was to illustrate the number of
columns).
The data is mainly used to troubleshoot problems... anything could be
meaningful to the one trying to figure out whats wrong. There are
other gadgets on the page to help figure out whats going on, and to
organize/sort/hide data.
I'm sorry... this may just be my own ignorance but I don't see why
this information is relevant to any of the questions. All I asked was
a simple layout question "how can you figure out which cell(s) will
expand in a 2x2 table if 1 column is rowspaned and the rowspaned cell
has lots of data in it". The answer was you don't (could be first 1,
could be 2nd one, could be both... And to have the ability to control
something like that then use CSS layout or nested tables).
If your speaking in relation to the min-width / CSS approach then all
you should have to know is that one of the cells widths is very
dynamic and A) forcing the width to be the same for all, or B)
dynamically setting min-width arn't really options I'm fond of.
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
NvrBst wrote:
> "Jukka K. Korpela" wrote:
>> Scripsit NvrBst:
>>> ...
>>
>> That pseudoquotation doesn't really give us much context, does it?
>>
>>> Anyway, baically the column headers usally go something like "Msg / X1
>>> Acks / X2 Acks / X1 N-Acks / X2 N-Acks / Rty 1 / Rty 2 / ... / Rty N /
>>> Dup Msg / Dup Overlap / etc".
>>
>> Is this explanation supposed to help?
>>
>> --
>> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
>
> LOL I did the pseudoquotation because I thought that you thought the
> quotes were getting to long ("Don't forget to snip sig lines").
...so why didn't you snip it?
> Anyway, as I said, I don't see how the column headers are relevant.
> 1000px isn't that wide and when you have many columns its easy to
> have 1000px width tables (the explanation was to illustrate the
> number of columns).
Initially, you were talking about 1000px *cells*, not tables. A table
that wide isn't necessarily a problem.
"As stated already the *Data1* cells' content changes. Sometimes the
cell needs to be 1000 pixels wide (rarly) to fit its content and
sometimes 30 pixels wide."
Make up your mind.
--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Vista
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 13, 4:10=A0pm, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.m... [at] example.invalid> wrote:
> NvrBst wrote:
> > "Jukka K. Korpela" wrote:
> >> Scripsit NvrBst:
> >>> ...
>
> >> That pseudoquotation doesn't really give us much context, does it?
>
> >>> Anyway, baically the column headers usally go something like "Msg / X1=
> >>> Acks / X2 Acks / X1 N-Acks / X2 N-Acks / Rty 1 / Rty 2 / ... / Rty N /=
> >>> Dup Msg / Dup Overlap / etc".
>
> >> Is this explanation supposed to help?
>
> >> --
> >> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
>
> > LOL I did the pseudoquotation because I thought that you thought the
> > quotes were getting to long ("Don't forget to snip sig lines").
>
> ..so why didn't you snip it?
>
> > Anyway, as I said, I don't see how the column headers are relevant.
> > 1000px isn't that wide and when you have many columns its easy to
> > have 1000px width tables (the explanation was to illustrate the
> > number of columns).
>
> Initially, you were talking about 1000px *cells*, not tables. A table
> that wide isn't necessarily a problem.
>
> "As stated already the *Data1* cells' content changes. =A0Sometimes the
> cell needs to be 1000 pixels wide (rarly) to fit its content and
> sometimes 30 pixels wide."
>
> Make up your mind.
>
> --
> =A0 =A0-bts
> =A0 =A0-Friends don't let friends drive Vista- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
LOL The *Data1* cell is getting the table (from the COM) put into it.
Inital table is 2x2 table (Menu in left colum, and Data1/Data2 in
right colum). Data1 Cell =3D 1000px'ish at time. And I did snip his
post.
NB
Re: HTML Table Question
Scripsit NvrBst:
> LOL
You're not even funny.
> The *Data1* cell is getting the table (from the COM) put into it.
> Inital table is 2x2 table (Menu in left colum, and Data1/Data2 in
> right colum). Data1 Cell = 1000px'ish at time.
Doesn't make much more sense than the rest of your postings. You might
have tried to tell something relevant by posting a URL, but you didn't.
> And I did snip his post.
Unless you intentionally wish to look like a moron, learn how to quote
on Usenet. Please do not change your foolish "nickname" before that.
Thank you in advance.
--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Re: HTML Table Question
On Jan 13, 11:29=A0pm, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp... [at] cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> Scripsit NvrBst:
>
> > LOL
>
> You're not even funny.
>
> > The *Data1* cell is getting the table (from the COM) put into it.
> > Inital table is 2x2 table (Menu in left colum, and Data1/Data2 in
> > right colum). =A0Data1 Cell =3D 1000px'ish at time.
>
> Doesn't make much more sense than the rest of your postings. You might
> have tried to tell something relevant by posting a URL, but you didn't.
>
> > And I did snip his post.
>
> Unless you intentionally wish to look like a moron, learn how to quote
> on Usenet. Please do not change your foolish "nickname" before that.
> Thank you in advance.
>
> --
> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Wow. This is the first time I've posted in alt.html... But I have to
say it is by far the worst group I've ever posted too; and I've posted
to some shady groups. For future reference, if you don't understand a
topic then don't reply/ignore it... It'll let people who don't mind
reading a few sentances help if they want to, and keep things cleaner
to boot (not mentioning common curtosy).
Simple questions don't need to be spoonfed with URL examples in my
opinion (I know you see it different)... And its halarious your trying
to insult my "nickname" Mr Yucca. LOL I'm out of this cesspool, enjoy
the swimming ya'all, but I'm sure you all are used to it.
NB
Miscellaneous » alt.html » HTML Table Question