SpaceGirl wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2:34 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w... [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 15, 3:23 pm, SpaceGirl <nothespacegirls... [at] subhuman.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 15, 11:39 am, 1001 Webs <1001w... [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>> You're really not doing yourself any favours.
>> Great comeback, really.
>> Neither are you, for that matter.
>>
>> Your comments would be greatly appreciated if they had any substance
>> or logic in them.
>> But they have none. Sound a lot like mindless parrot-like
>> repetition ...
>> And it's not the first time that this happens to you ...
>
> Okay, I'll elaborate: Your "apology" seemed more like an excuse to
> post a whiny diatribe filled with thinly disguised insults. Is that
> better?
>
> If you worry about people posting negative comments regarding your
> company, the first step I'd take is Stop Posting! You're a marketing
> disaster :)
Okay, that was rude. But it was unbelievably accurate and
abundantly amusing. Heh!
--
"I get the impression that Jamie is a papusa or two short of a
combination plate." - Kent Wills
"A lot of Southeast Oregon appears to be low resolution
even when you are physically driving through it! - Uncle Bob
