Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

In article <ct64cb01h0t [at] news1.newsguy.com>, Anonymous [at] 127.001 says...
> In just the three short hours I added a hit counter, I've had 30 hits with
> 11 unique.
>
> Operating system: Windows XP
> Browser: IE 6.
> Screen resolution of 1024x768
>
> Reported as the most used by visitors.
> The counter does not include my own hits.
> I use firefox in favor of IE and I do not use XP.
>
> But next month it will probably show only 40 hits.

Those are all from us, though, dimwit.

--
Hywel http://kibo.org.uk/
I do not eat quiche.

While the city slept, Richard (Anonymous [at] 127.001) feverishly typed...

> In just the three short hours I added a hit counter

It took you three hours to go to Bravenet and add their code to your page?

> I've had 30 hits with 11 unique.

Woooo! That'll be all the people in here going to see how crap your site is
now everytime you post the URI...

Cheers,
Nige

--
Nigel Moss
http://www.nigenet.org.uk
Mail address not valid. nigel [at] DOG.nigenet.org.uk, take the DOG. out!
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is very, very busy!

Richard wrote:
> In just the three short hours I added a hit counter, I've had 30 hits with
> 11 unique.
>
> Operating system: Windows XP
> Browser: IE 6.
> Screen resolution of 1024x768
>
> Reported as the most used by visitors.
> The counter does not include my own hits.
> I use firefox in favor of IE and I do not use XP.
>
> But next month it will probably show only 40 hits.
>
>
>
>

In your site? Thats is not much?

We have a 125479 hits and 1103 unigues and it is not much. Best unique
number is over 2000 in month.

--
--
http://www.technologycommunity.com/

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:48:56 -0600, "Richard" <Anonymous [at] 127.001>
wrote:

>In just the three short hours I added a hit counter, I've had 30 hits with
>11 unique.

Wow. So you had 19 _repeat_ visits ?



> Anonymous [at] 127.001

This still really cracks me up 8-)

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:17:42 -0000 Hywel Jenkins wrote:

> In article <ct64cb01h0t [at] news1.newsguy.com>, Anonymous [at] 127.001 says...
>> In just the three short hours I added a hit counter, I've had 30 hits
>> with
>> 11 unique.

>> Operating system: Windows XP
>> Browser: IE 6.
>> Screen resolution of 1024x768

>> Reported as the most used by visitors.
>> The counter does not include my own hits.
>> I use firefox in favor of IE and I do not use XP.

>> But next month it will probably show only 40 hits.

> Those are all from us, though, dimwit.

I know that dipshit.

Matti Kiviharju wrote:
> Richard wrote:
>
>> In just the three short hours I added a hit counter, I've had 30
>> hits with 11 unique.
>
> In your site? Thats is not much?
>
> Best unique number is over 2000 in month.

Which works out to 66.66666... per day, 2.77777... per hour, or
8.333333... every three hours; more than the 11 that RtS claims to have
gotten in three hours. (Of course, your figure is counting off-peak
hours too.)

Leif K-Brooks wrote:
> more than the 11 that RtS claims to have gotten in three hours.

Er... less! Less!

"Richard" <Anonymous [at] 127.001> wrote in message
news:ct68h901lh2 [at] news1.newsguy.com...
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:17:42 -0000 Hywel Jenkins wrote:
>
> > In article <ct64cb01h0t [at] news1.newsguy.com>, Anonymous [at] 127.001 says...
> >> In just the three short hours I added a hit counter, I've had 30 hits
> >> with
> >> 11 unique.
>
> >> Operating system: Windows XP
> >> Browser: IE 6.
> >> Screen resolution of 1024x768
>
> >> Reported as the most used by visitors.
> >> The counter does not include my own hits.
> >> I use firefox in favor of IE and I do not use XP.
>
> >> But next month it will probably show only 40 hits.
>
> > Those are all from us, though, dimwit.
>
> I know that dipshit.

So what's your point?

--
Sam.
www.fixaphoto.co.uk
high quality photographic
restorations and repairs

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Richard wrote:

> I've had 30 hits with 11 unique.

So? Site at work gets about 15000 page requests per day.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact

In article <35np6lF4plighU2 [at] individual.net>, Leif K-Brooks says...
> Leif K-Brooks wrote:
> > more than the 11 that RtS claims to have gotten in three hours.
>
> Er... less! Less!

But that's regular traffic, not just people from this group!

Dan

On 25 Jan 2005 22:23:21 GMT Duende wrote:

> While sitting in a puddle Fat Sam scribbled in the mud:

>>> I know that dipshit.

>> So what's your point?


> So now you want a point? Why?

Because.

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:42:36 -0500 Leif K-Brooks wrote:

> Matti Kiviharju wrote:
>> Richard wrote:

>>> In just the three short hours I added a hit counter, I've had 30
>>> hits with 11 unique.

>> In your site? Thats is not much?

>> Best unique number is over 2000 in month.

> Which works out to 66.66666... per day, 2.77777... per hour, or
> 8.333333... every three hours; more than the 11 that RtS claims to have
> gotten in three hours. (Of course, your figure is counting off-peak
> hours too.)


66.6?

The devil you say.

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:18:15 +0000 Andy Dingley wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:48:56 -0600, "Richard" <Anonymous [at] 127.001>
> wrote:

>>In just the three short hours I added a hit counter, I've had 30 hits
>>with
>>11 unique.

> Wow. So you had 19 _repeat_ visits ?

No. 11 people, some of whom refreshed the page. Probably checking to see if
it worked with JS on and off.
I am now over 100 hits, 36 unique. Whoopee!




>> Anonymous [at] 127.001

> This still really cracks me up 8-)

"Richard" <Anonymous [at] 127.001> wrote in message
news:ct70be0gb6 [at] news1.newsguy.com...
> I am now over 100 hits, 36 unique. Whoopee!

Its like an unstoppable juggernaut of eCommerce!!

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

In article <tm-A99AA9.14502626012005 [at] newsflood.tokyo.att.ne.jp>, tm
says...
> Augustus wrote:
> > "Richard" <Anonymous [at] 127.001> wrote
>
> > > I am now over 100 hits, 36 unique. Whoopee!
> >
> > Its like an unstoppable juggernaut of eCommerce!!
>
> Someone inform Microsoft. A new player is in town!

In fairness, I was pretty excited the first time one of my sites
starting receiving traffic. I eagerly watched the stats, I just didn't
post them to Usenet.

Richard, everybody is proud of their achievements with their websites,
but you'll get a much better response here if you only update us after a
decent amount of progress.

Dan