I am editing a website that has two frames, one for the menu and one
for the content. Something strange happens when I edit the menu HTML
file. The menu disappears from the frame when I remove just one row
from the table containing the menu. How can this be, I am only
removing one menu item ?

Daniel wrote:
> I am editing a website that has two frames, one for the menu and one
> for the content. Something strange happens when I edit the menu HTML
> file. The menu disappears from the frame when I remove just one row
> from the table containing the menu. How can this be, I am only
> removing one menu item ?

The problem is on....let's see call on Mentok the Mind Tinker
(ooo-wee-ooo)...line 16 of you code.

Seriously, a URL please. Obviously, you are causing a syntax error in
your markup.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

In article
<b594a91b-5cd8-40de-a68a-c3cc02025de5 [at] l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
Daniel <danwgrace [at] gmail.com> wrote:

> I am editing a website that has two frames, one for the menu and one
> for the content. Something strange happens when I edit the menu HTML
> file. The menu disappears from the frame when I remove just one row
> from the table containing the menu. How can this be, I am only
> removing one menu item ?

Two theories to this mystery:

1. There is only one row to the table and removing it removes the only
content there is.

2. Perhaps I better not... my leeway is nearly run out...

--
dorayme

On 23 Apr 2008, dorayme <doraymeRidThis [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> Daniel <danwgrace [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am editing a website that has two frames, one for the menu and one
>> for the content. Something strange happens when I edit the menu HTML
>> file. The menu disappears from the frame when I remove just one row
>> from the table containing the menu. How can this be, I am only
>> removing one menu item ?
>
> Two theories to this mystery:
>
> 1. There is only one row to the table and removing it removes the only
> content there is.

Ha, I was going to say that! See how you've corrupted me...

> 2. Perhaps I better not... my leeway is nearly run out...

You've indicated previously you're around 60 so no surprise there.

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

In article <Xns9A89EBE131111neredbojiasnano [at] 85.214.90.236>,
Neredbojias <me [at] http://www.neredbojias.com/_eml/fliam.php> wrote:

> On 23 Apr 2008, dorayme <doraymeRidThis [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Daniel <danwgrace [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I am editing a website that has two frames, one for the menu and one
> >> for the content. Something strange happens when I edit the menu HTML
> >> file. The menu disappears from the frame when I remove just one row
> >> from the table containing the menu. How can this be, I am only
> >> removing one menu item ?
> >
> > Two theories to this mystery:
> >
> > 1. There is only one row to the table and removing it removes the only
> > content there is.
>
> Ha, I was going to say that! See how you've corrupted me...
>
> > 2. Perhaps I better not... my leeway is nearly run out...
>
> You've indicated previously you're around 60 so no surprise there.

I never indicated any such thing. How dare you! You are out by at least
an order of magnitude, young man.

--
dorayme

On 23 Apr 2008, dorayme <doraymeRidThis [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>> >> I am editing a website that has two frames, one for the menu and
>> >> one for the content. Something strange happens when I edit the
>> >> menu HTML file. The menu disappears from the frame when I remove
>> >> just one row from the table containing the menu. How can this be,
>> >> I am only removing one menu item ?
>> >
>> > Two theories to this mystery:
>> >
>> > 1. There is only one row to the table and removing it removes the
>> > only content there is.
>>
>> Ha, I was going to say that! See how you've corrupted me...
>>
>> > 2. Perhaps I better not... my leeway is nearly run out...
>>
>> You've indicated previously you're around 60 so no surprise there.
>
> I never indicated any such thing. How dare you! You are out by at
> least an order of magnitude, young man.

Well, I s'pose I could be mistaken. But you're more ornery than Blinky,
and he's around 60, and it has been my experience in life that the older
people get, the crankier they get, so...

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds